[05:51:03] --- davidbnelson has joined [05:51:10] * davidbnelson has changed the subject to: RADEXT WG Meeting IETF-71 [06:05:06] --- alan.dekok has joined [06:05:19] --- afh has joined [06:05:37] --- klaas has joined [06:05:54] I can hear the audio, so I don't need a jabber transcript... just someone willing talk at the mike [06:07:19] ok, and let me know if you have any questions [06:13:13] --- davem has joined [06:16:06] yeah I still have that issue! [06:17:29] --- aland has joined [06:22:10] Glen had explanations via email. [06:22:36] I understand... I'm not sure it's a good idea [06:23:04] (changed screen names because laptop died...) [06:23:50] poll? [06:24:22] oppose! [06:24:31] second or first? [06:24:39] first... never mind. :( [06:24:52] against enabling [06:25:08] not infavor of recoding attrs [06:25:38] and the audio cut out on me for a few minutes too! [06:26:00] guess next time you need to be here ;-) [06:26:03] IETF? counting votes? [06:26:43] humm-ng [06:26:49] --- john.zhao has joined [06:26:51] tell my management :( [06:29:28] where are we on the agenda? is this doc status or have we started a presentation? [06:30:10] doc status [06:30:53] --- alan.dekok has left [06:30:54] autorization-02 [06:37:51] IEEE 802 attributes draft [06:38:43] RADIUS support for EAP ReAuth [06:38:59] crypto-agility [06:39:25] --- behcet.sarikaya has joined [06:47:50] poll [06:47:57] adopt [06:48:00] ? [06:52:45] sounds is getting pretty bad... [06:53:14] hmmm [06:54:10] both mikes? [06:54:31] glen's mike is very quiet [06:54:38] or it's just glen? [06:54:44] might be [06:55:25] it is probably Glen's typical modest way of talking ;-) [06:55:40] Hmm... [06:55:48] Bernard better? [06:58:04] yes [07:16:49] --- ldondeti has joined [07:21:10] --- mark.jones has joined [07:24:21] --- mark.jones has left [07:26:45] --- behcet.sarikaya has left [07:27:18] --- behcet.sarikaya has joined [07:30:44] dang - lost audio totally cannot reconnect [07:31:07] do the others still have audio? [07:31:41] no way to reconnect [07:32:03] hmmm [07:32:25] carefull you may be voting for something ;^) [07:32:36] ;-) [07:33:57] why tls in radius when there is diameter (Hannes) [07:35:20] bernard: we'll see what wg consensus is [07:35:46] glen: tls and dtls no magic bullets [07:35:56] key distro still problem [07:37:00] stefan: clear that tls needs key management, but you can do it if needed, has been done in eduroam [07:37:48] glen: not debating whether is possible, but it is hard to get sp's to change radius [07:38:09] defered to after radsec discussion [07:38:17] now radsec presentation [07:38:27] (please let me know if sound comes back) [07:40:10] I finally managed to reconnect [07:40:33] --- afh has left [07:43:25] --- behcet.sarikaya has left [07:47:40] Proxies can be eliminated for eduroam, not for other systems... [07:48:48] --- mark.jones has joined [07:54:06] --- mark.jones has left [07:54:21] can people talk into the mikes please? [07:55:23] sound is back... but very quiet. [07:59:58] --- ldondeti has left [08:04:50] can people please speak into the mikes? [08:04:53] --- ldondeti has joined [08:04:57] oh well.. [08:05:21] i asked if they could speak in the mic [08:07:07] thanks... [08:08:00] consensus call, radsec in wg? [08:08:14] raises hand for radsec as WG item [08:08:46] noted [08:08:51] thx [08:08:52] --- michaelpeck@jabber.org has joined [08:10:03] there may also be a AAA proxy security BoF in Dublin. [08:11:18] bof to start seperate wg for radsec? vote [08:11:29] I wouldn't oppose it... [08:11:59] abstaining on this [08:12:09] like most ;-) [08:12:12] --- aland has left [08:12:42] next presentation: how to prevent radius packet fragmentation with eap [08:12:47] --- histerrier has joined [08:26:57] --- michaelpeck@jabber.org has left [08:36:22] --- histerrier has left [08:36:31] over and out, see you in Dublin [08:36:48] --- davidbnelson has left [08:36:53] --- klaas has left [08:37:03] back to work... [08:37:06] --- davem has left [08:38:27] --- john.zhao has left [09:05:41] --- ldondeti has left