[14:17:25] cpignata joins the room [14:25:50] amalis joins the room [14:26:52] kenichi joins the room [14:27:26] amalis leaves the room [14:29:37] David Sinicrope joins the room [14:30:03] amalis joins the room [14:30:06] amalis leaves the room [14:39:10] bnsmith joins the room [14:40:38] kenichi leaves the room [14:56:47] iL76 joins the room [15:00:24] Peny joins the room [15:02:57] Q: Currently, the VCCV CV Types represent payload types (e.g. IPv4, IPv6) and the new channels to allocate are functional types (e.g., OAM functions, APS functions, etc). Does this change of semantincs of the channel type has an impact (e.g., currently IPv4 channel type can carry OAM), or should the channel type be partitioned into a payload type / function type fields? [15:03:27] I don't know if someone is on the room that could please relay the question. [15:03:36] Thanks, Carlos Pignataro. [15:10:55] David Sinicrope leaves the room [15:16:21] Stewart Bryant joins the room [15:39:54] iL76 leaves the room: Replaced by new connection [15:40:05] iL76 joins the room [15:45:25] Peny leaves the room: Replaced by new connection [15:45:29] Peny joins the room [15:46:32] eycho joins the room [16:05:17] Peny leaves the room: Replaced by new connection [16:18:05] iL76 leaves the room [16:25:51] Stewart Bryant leaves the room [16:26:59] eycho leaves the room [16:34:21] cpignata leaves the room [16:34:21] cpignata joins the room [21:09:20] cpignata leaves the room