[09:58:15] Melinda joins the room [10:50:18] spturner joins the room [10:51:06] Carl Wallace joins the room [10:53:15] jimsch joins the room [10:55:56] David Cooper joins the room [10:58:23] mtcarrasco joins the room [10:58:57] yoav.nir joins the room [11:06:16] hardaker joins the room [11:11:17] Ping [11:11:48] pong [11:12:12] pong. [11:12:20] audio feed doesn't seem to work for me :-( [11:12:59] The room speakers work. Do others manage to hear? [11:13:55] josoinin@neonsite.net joins the room [11:14:21] It's spotty. There was someone who wasn't speaking into the mike or something. This is fine. [11:15:47] can you hear the speaker? [11:15:47] Can you hear David Cooper now? [11:16:01] David Cooper - RFC 5280 Clarifications - sound? [11:16:18] I suspect for me, it's me. I'm in another room and sometimes I've had issues trying to listen to streams within the IETF network itself. [11:19:33] Paul Hoffman [11:20:08] the sound is fine for me [11:24:35] Sorry, I'm just lurking on the Jabber room. On which agenda item are you now? [11:24:57] 5280 clairifications [11:25:11] not sure what slide though - maybe 3 (Status is in the title) [11:25:19] David Cooper is presenting [11:25:26] OK, great, thanks. [11:25:34] http://tools.ietf.org/wg/pkix/agenda [http://tools.ietf.org/wg/pkix/agenda] [11:25:45] http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/78/slides/pkix-1.pdf [http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/78/slides/pkix-1.pdf] [11:26:04] Did you already go through agenda points 2.1 and 2.2? [11:26:20] moving on to updating OCSP [11:26:20] Basically, are you following the original agenda? [11:26:30] Thanks! [11:26:49] yes [11:26:49] http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/78/slides/pkix-2.pdf [http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/78/slides/pkix-2.pdf] [11:26:59] we're on 2.4 now [11:27:06] OK, good. [11:35:23] Can you inform, when you move to the 2.5 agenda item? [11:42:17] I will right before I stand up ;) [11:42:24] Great, thanks! [11:47:22] so should same text go in 5280 update for CRLs? [11:48:27] jimsch leaves the room [11:51:22] Carl did you hear that? [11:51:29] is it done? [11:51:40] no indirect CRLs [11:51:44] not rather [11:51:48] if it's there, fine [11:51:51] they're going to check it [11:52:14] good enough - just not limited to indirects [11:52:17] jimsch1 joins the room [11:53:19] it's there [11:53:44] "At a minimum, implementations validating CRLs MUST ensure that the certification path of a certificate and the CRL issuer certification path used to validate the certificate terminate at the same trust anchor." [11:55:26] barry.constantine joins the room [11:55:51] barry.constantine leaves the room [12:12:35] Melinda leaves the room [12:16:37] tobias joins the room [12:19:20] tifflen joins the room [12:25:14] Are you still on 2.4? [12:25:19] yes [12:25:26] supplemental slides [12:26:37] Having fun, now aren't you... [12:28:09] yes [12:34:36] Get out asap a new RFC with the editorial changes, similar to the "edition" http://www.w3.org/TR/xml [http://www.w3.org/TR/xml] in W3C. The guiding principle should to avoid breaking current implementations. [12:38:30] on to 2.5 [12:39:24] Thanks! [12:41:03] josoinin@neonsite.net leaves the room [12:43:17] 2.6 [12:43:22] yes on to 2.6 [12:43:37] tifflen leaves the room [12:47:27] Carl Wallace leaves the room [12:53:29] jimsch1 leaves the room [12:54:58] spturner leaves the room [12:57:22] mtcarrasco leaves the room [12:57:37] David Cooper leaves the room [12:57:52] yoav.nir leaves the room [12:58:47] tobias leaves the room [13:14:12] hardaker leaves the room [13:33:16] hardaker joins the room [14:40:31] spturner joins the room [14:43:29] spturner leaves the room [14:50:33] spturner joins the room [14:50:37] hardaker leaves the room [15:07:29] spturner leaves the room [15:49:37] spturner joins the room [16:23:30] spturner leaves the room