IETF
ospf
ospf@jabber.ietf.org
Monday, March 11, 2013< ^ >
TJ has set the subject to: OSPF
Room Configuration
Room Occupants

GMT+0
[17:03:56] Stewart Bryant joins the room
[17:05:21] You-GT joins the room
[17:06:48] Markus Stenberg joins the room
[17:12:12] john.dowdell joins the room
[17:13:10] mjbarnes joins the room
[17:13:32] You-GT leaves the room
[17:15:02] David 'equinox' Lamparter joins the room
[17:15:36] Ole Troan joins the room
[17:22:57] mjbarnes leaves the room
[17:23:00] Michael Barnes joins the room
[17:26:31] John Scudder joins the room
[17:34:09] Markus Stenberg leaves the room
[17:34:14] <John Scudder> for those of us who joined late, is an updated agenda anywhere handy?
[17:34:43] <David 'equinox' Lamparter> +1 that question...
[17:36:43] Markus Stenberg joins the room
[17:37:15] <David 'equinox' Lamparter> anyone relaying this at all?
[17:38:50] adrianolddog joins the room
[17:42:37] <Ole Troan> I think the reference is in the homenet document already...
[17:43:10] <Ole Troan> who asked the question?
[17:43:27] <John Scudder> Acee I think
[17:43:49] <David 'equinox' Lamparter> The reference is indeed in there, top of page 5
[17:50:03] <David 'equinox' Lamparter> That was my comment, and I actually provided draft text for it :o
[17:50:38] <David 'equinox' Lamparter> not that though.
[17:53:14] mwm joins the room
[17:53:58] mwm leaves the room
[17:54:29] john.dowdell leaves the room
[17:59:44] Juan Pedro Cerezo joins the room
[17:59:56] Juan Pedro Cerezo leaves the room
[18:01:07] <David 'equinox' Lamparter> What will happen on a network with mixed support/non-support for this extension?
[18:01:25] <David 'equinox' Lamparter> In particular, a shared network where the DR supports it and the BDR doesn't?
[18:04:11] SwedeMike joins the room
[18:12:46] Markus Stenberg leaves the room
[18:12:50] Markus Stenberg joins the room
[18:13:17] Markus Stenberg joins the room
[18:13:18] Markus Stenberg leaves the room
[18:13:33] jgs joins the room
[18:14:38] <jgs> rearranged agenda continuing to confuse me. has "Extensions to OSPF facilitating the deployment of non-backward-compatible changes" already been presented, anyone know?
[18:16:40] John Scudder is now known as John G. Scudder
[18:17:01] <David 'equinox' Lamparter> i caught the end of the TE metric discussion, then next was Fred's stack of 3, then asymmetric holdtimers... something got dropped, maybe it was that draft?
[18:17:04] jgs leaves the room
[18:17:24] <David 'equinox' Lamparter> also, no one in the room seems to be reading this
[18:17:40] John G. Scudder leaves the room
[18:18:26] John G. Scudder joins the room
[18:19:18] adrianolddog joins the room
[18:21:45] John Scudder joins the room
[18:24:05] <David 'equinox' Lamparter> this draft sounds remotely similar to what IS-IS does, with the outside of the TTZ corresponding to L2, and the inside L1...
[18:27:38] <Markus Stenberg> jgs, I think the reordering was mainly to do with Fred's draft, but not sure, got here mid-way due to JSON BOF
[18:28:39] Markus Stenberg leaves the room
[18:33:22] Ole Troan leaves the room
[18:58:25] John G. Scudder leaves the room
[19:07:02] John Scudder leaves the room
[19:30:35] adrianolddog leaves the room
[19:31:53] John Scudder joins the room
[19:32:01] Stewart Bryant leaves the room
[19:45:37] adrianolddog joins the room
[19:50:51] adrianolddog leaves the room
[19:59:15] Michael Barnes leaves the room
[21:17:16] John Scudder leaves the room
Powered by ejabberd Powered by Erlang Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS!