netmod - Thursday, August 1, 2013

netmod

netmod@jabber.ietf.org

Thursday, August 1, 2013< ^ >

benoit.claise has set the subject to: NETMOD WG Meeting, IETF 86

Room Configuration

Room Occupants

GMT+0
[14:55:18] mbj joins the room
[14:59:40] ladislav.lhotka joins the room
[15:02:37] <ladislav.lhotka> Hi Martin, can you hear audio?
[15:02:51] <mbj> yes!
[15:03:29] equinox joins the room
[15:11:33] davewaltermire joins the room
[15:12:39] joel jaeggli joins the room
[15:12:52] Adam Montville joins the room
[15:13:09] joel jaeggli has set the subject to: NETMOD IETF87
[15:13:32] <joel jaeggli> is anyone remote?
[15:14:29] <mbj> yes
[15:15:02] <mbj> are you jabber proxy?  I didn't hear if there was anyone assinged
[15:20:35] <mbj> Comment:  Since the leafref target MUST exist, config cannot point to operational state, since the operational state may be removed by the server, resulting in an invalid running config.
[15:21:14] <mbj> Agree w/ Balazs - we should have kept require-instance on leafref.
[15:23:12] <equinox> oh, we have no relay?
[15:23:24] <mbj> Apparently not...
[15:23:35] <equinox> ok i'll relay i guess
[15:23:58] <equinox> your previous comments were brought up by different people, i guess
[15:24:28] <mbj> Comment: the guideline in 6087 is a SHOULD.  And I believe we now know more so the guideline could be removed.
[15:24:48] joel jaeggli leaves the room
[15:24:50] <equinox> grah, sorry, i think the discussion is moving on
[15:24:55] <equinox> should i still raise it?
[15:25:04] <mbj> it is ok.
[15:25:15] <mbj> they said the same thing
[15:25:17] joel jaeggli joins the room
[15:27:05] joel jaeggli leaves the room
[15:30:56] joel jaeggli joins the room
[15:31:33] <joel jaeggli> sorry I had to step out
[15:33:34] ladislav.lhotka leaves the room
[15:36:08] ladislav.lhotka joins the room
[15:48:17] ladislav.lhotka leaves the room
[15:48:30] ladislav.lhotka joins the room
[15:49:37] <ladislav.lhotka> Sorry, I am the jabber scribe, but I could act as such when presenting.
[15:50:36] <ladislav.lhotka> I could not ...
[15:53:04] <mbj> Question: Why did you model this as configuration data?
[15:53:59] <equinox> that's probably the same question as ro/rw :)
[15:54:04] <mbj> yep!
[15:54:27] <mbj> I don't have to ask my questions, it seems...
[15:54:28] <equinox> though i'd certainly love writing to the topology...
[15:54:33] <mbj> :)
[16:00:13] <mbj> Comment: I agree w/ Lada.
[16:00:40] <mbj> There are also other things that have come up that we should look at.
[16:06:26] <mbj> COmment: I think it makes sense to do data models in domain-specific WGs, and keep YANG (the language) in NETMOD.
[16:07:03] benoit.claise joins the room
[16:24:41] joel jaeggli leaves the room
[16:26:55] <mbj> Comment: Agree w/ Lada. *if* we re-spin 6020, we should make sure we concentrate on things that cannot be done w/ YANG extensions.
[16:30:06] Adam Montville leaves the room
[16:30:35] benoit.claise leaves the room
[16:30:36] ladislav.lhotka leaves the room
[16:30:44] davewaltermire leaves the room
[16:30:45] equinox leaves the room: Machine going to sleep
[16:35:45] joel jaeggli joins the room
[16:44:54] ladislav.lhotka joins the room
[16:50:53] mbj leaves the room
[17:08:40] joel jaeggli leaves the room
[17:24:55] joel jaeggli joins the room
[17:44:25] joel jaeggli leaves the room
[17:46:23] ladislav.lhotka leaves the room
[19:14:11] ladislav.lhotka joins the room
[19:20:13] ladislav.lhotka leaves the room
[19:40:51] ladislav.lhotka joins the room
[20:27:51] ladislav.lhotka leaves the room
[23:28:02] joel jaeggli joins the room
[23:37:56] joel jaeggli leaves the room