[08:25:13] clns joins the room [08:25:14] clns leaves the room: offline [15:23:14] Mark Ellison joins the room [15:52:03] bertwijnen@jabber.psg.com joins the room [15:52:33] http://tools.ietf.org/wg/netconf/agenda?item=agenda77.html [15:53:09] Good morning Mark. Are you here at IETF meeting? [15:54:53] Hi Bert, I am in New Hampshire! [15:55:23] wow, so early for you. Welcome [15:55:44] LOL- noontime! [15:56:14] aha otherway around. sorry [15:56:34] FYI, sound level is good [16:00:18] Atarashi Yoshifumi joins the room [16:01:31] dromasca joins the room [16:02:01] hi Mark [16:02:15] Juergen Schoenwaelder joins the room [16:02:22] good morning Dan [16:02:23] hi Juergen [16:02:33] do you guys hear audio-stream? [16:02:34] hi - audio is good so far [16:04:38] Stephen joins the room [16:07:17] mic is not on [16:07:55] DavidAlanReid joins the room [16:08:00] which mic? can you hear mehmet? [16:09:01] the audience mic is off [16:10:48] i turned it on now [16:17:50] Margaret Wasserman joins the room [16:24:07] swhyte@google.com joins the room [16:33:11] dromasca leaves the room [16:33:41] Where are things in the agenda now? [16:33:54] dromasca joins the room [16:34:02] charter item #1 [16:35:48] raj joins the room [16:41:54] ray_atarashi joins the room [16:42:18] ray_atarashi leaves the room [16:42:55] dromasca leaves the room [16:43:54] ray_atarashi joins the room [16:48:57] How are things going agenda-wise? [16:49:08] finishing up with #1 [16:49:44] Do you want me to add a jabber note as we approach the end of item #2? [16:53:44] Margaret- we're on the last slide of #2 [16:53:52] Margaret Wasserman leaves the room [16:56:55] dromasca joins the room [17:00:44] DavidAlanReid leaves the room [17:02:32] DavidAlanReid joins the room [17:06:28] remote participants? do you have any opinion? [17:06:35] in favor of wglc? [17:06:45] no preferences [17:07:36] dromasca leaves the room [17:10:06] dromasca joins the room [17:10:22] any answers from remote particiapnts? i was disconnected [17:12:16] bob cole - 'robust' configuration [17:15:31] Margaret Wasserman joins the room [17:19:48] Margaret Wasserman leaves the room [17:22:08] dlpartain joins the room [17:30:32] dromasca leaves the room [17:30:35] dromasca joins the room [17:37:18] dromasca leaves the room [17:42:32] dlpartain leaves the room [17:48:23] swhyte@google.com leaves the room [17:51:40] dromasca joins the room [17:52:57] any remote feedback welcome! [18:03:38] dromasca leaves the room [18:06:46] mk joins the room [18:13:34] I understand Wes' concerns. I think there needs to be different initial profiles- very secure, secure, etc. like for VACM [18:14:03] dromasca joins the room [18:18:37] dromasca leaves the room [18:20:02] callemoberg joins the room [18:20:20] I'm wondering if the UNIX file system access rules are a better model for all of this? A node would be owned by someone and access would be set for owner, group, other [18:20:57] ray_atarashi leaves the room [18:25:46] Stephen leaves the room [18:31:54] smithandjohnson joins the room [18:32:12] Atarashi Yoshifumi leaves the room [18:32:19] smithandjohnson leaves the room [18:32:27] dlpartain joins the room [18:33:50] dlpartain leaves the room [18:34:23] Mark Ellison leaves the room [18:37:32] callemoberg leaves the room [18:40:02] mk leaves the room [18:40:16] bertwijnen@jabber.psg.com leaves the room [18:45:19] Mark Ellison joins the room [18:45:40] Mark Ellison leaves the room [18:56:18] Juergen Schoenwaelder leaves the room: Disconnected [18:58:46] Stephen joins the room [19:03:23] Stephen leaves the room [19:13:32] DavidAlanReid leaves the room [19:26:48] weshardaker joins the room [19:33:08] raj leaves the room [20:00:51] weshardaker leaves the room [20:46:24] Simon Leinen joins the room [21:57:02] Simon Leinen leaves the room