[13:48:42] --- dperkins3600 has joined [14:18:33] --- psavola has joined [14:55:35] --- dromasca has joined [14:56:22] --- weshardaker has joined [14:57:28] charlie kaufman - netconf over tls [14:57:50] wes - r u in the room? [14:57:55] yeah. [14:57:56] ignore me. [14:58:01] dead in here isn't it... [14:58:03] --- rstory has joined [14:58:05] ok :-) [15:14:22] --- lengyel has joined [15:14:35] --- badra has joined [15:14:45] --- badra has left [15:14:53] --- m_ersue has joined [15:14:57] --- davidbnelson has joined [15:15:03] --- m_ersue has left [15:15:03] --- stephen.morris has joined [15:15:41] --- stephen.morris has joined [15:16:13] --- stephen.morris has left [15:16:34] --- weshardaker has joined [15:17:22] --- lhotka has joined [15:17:38] --- lhotka has left [15:20:04] --- dromasca has joined [15:20:18] --- davidbnelson has joined [15:20:43] * davidbnelson has changed the subject to: Netconf Meeting at IETF-71 [15:20:52] --- omnione has joined [15:21:20] Current preso is partial node locking. [15:22:19] Q: Behavior with regard to subtrees? Deleting nodes in a sub-tree. [15:23:11] Needs some clarification in the draft. [15:23:46] Provides more node locking info. [15:24:14] --- mrose@jabber.dbc.mtview.ca.us has joined [15:24:50] --- mrose@jabber.dbc.mtview.ca.us has left [15:25:57] --- dperkins3600 has joined [15:26:28] Finally, Jabber works! [15:26:37] :-) [15:28:21] Discussion of modeling languages. Something needs to be normative. [15:29:03] Need to use a stabdard language, XSD has been used up to now. [15:31:58] Mult-Datastore Lock, see no use case, seems to be in the draft, should be removerd. [15:32:50] Security comments. Need more -- OK, but please contribute text. [15:33:41] Currently poinst to RFC4741 for Security Considerations. [15:34:07] Issue that the tree could possibly change. [15:37:10] Q; What expectations do we have on locking? Are there possible unexpected outcomes? [15:37:15] --- badra has joined [15:38:25] Access Control for Partial Locking. [15:39:20] Not sure what is needed... [15:41:11] --- badra has left: Replaced by new connection [15:41:21] --- badra has joined [15:41:33] Text of the draft should not speculate about what the access control will be, [15:42:54] Q: Why different security concerns for partial lock? Wes H. will send some comments on this to the list. [15:44:20] Next preso on Netconf monitoring schema. [15:45:00] Updates to teh draft since IETF-70. [15:46:52] Do we need a specialzed verb for get-schema? [15:47:07] --- rohan has joined [15:48:56] Does anybody know Mr. Okita from Hitachi in this room? [15:52:48] --- weshardaker has left: Lost connection [15:59:16] --- Juergen has joined [16:01:54] Implementation reports? [16:03:59] Who will implement partial lock? 3 [16:04:11] Monitoring? 4 [16:04:50] TLS draft? [16:05:22] None. [16:05:55] Will ask on the mailing list who will implement TLS. [16:06:20] --- atarashi has joined [16:06:22] --- Juergen has left [16:06:45] Anyone interested in an interoperabilty event? [16:08:14] None. [16:08:57] Next preso on SOAP implementation experience. [16:09:45] Individual submission ID via AD sponsorship. [16:10:13] --- badra has left: Replaced by new connection [16:10:20] --- badra has joined [16:15:03] Any other business. [16:15:36] --- rohan has left [16:15:42] Should we consider doing anything about access control? [16:15:54] Out of charter scope now. [16:17:03] Andy B. is interested. And one other, [16:17:45] How many reviewers? [16:18:22] Sharon C. What's the level of urgency? [16:19:10] Support fo continued deferral. [16:19:31] Who has implementd the notiifcation draft? [16:19:38] 4 [16:21:10] Q: Any plan to stanandardize content for notification? [16:23:43] 7 [16:24:57] Any interest in a document on event notification for syslog, SNMP? [16:25:07] 5 [16:27:07] Netconf requirements on DML? [16:28:26] What would be a good outcome in the canmod BOF? [16:28:49] --- rohan has joined [16:29:59] --- m_ersue has joined [16:31:36] --- badra has left: Replaced by new connection [16:31:44] --- badra has joined [16:33:35] --- rohan has left [16:35:51] --- m_ersue has left [16:37:32] --- ray has joined [16:42:02] --- ray has left [16:42:28] --- ray has joined [16:42:43] This localization discussion is time wasting. The XML messages are not for humans. [16:44:07] I agree with Phil. It's Ok with have "outer XML" in XML, but of course content has to be local language. [16:45:38] --- rstory has joined [16:48:58] --- ray has left: Replaced by new connection [16:54:53] End of session. [16:54:58] --- davidbnelson has left [16:55:17] --- atarashi has left [16:55:21] --- rstory has left [16:56:00] --- dromasca has left [16:56:16] --- dperkins3600 has left [17:06:39] --- omnione has left [17:08:04] --- badra has left [19:26:56] --- omnione has joined