Wednesday, July 28, 2021< ^ >
Room Configuration
Room Occupants

[18:41:02] Meetecho joins the room
[18:45:03] Paolo Saviano_web_140 joins the room
[18:45:03] Yiu Lee_web_189 joins the room
[18:45:03] Michael Jenkins_web_583 joins the room
[18:45:46] Dirk Hugo_web_417 joins the room
[18:47:07] Yiu Lee_web_189 leaves the room
[18:47:30] Yiu Lee_web_660 joins the room
[18:48:28] meetecho-alex joins the room
[18:48:39] Michael Richardson_web_849 joins the room
[18:49:10] Juan-Carlos Zúñiga_web_474 joins the room
[18:50:06] Markus Amend_web_349 joins the room
[18:50:46] Peter Koch_web_759 joins the room
[18:51:41] Jurgen Sonnenmoser_web_682 joins the room
[18:52:05] Jim Reid_web_945 joins the room
[18:52:18] Carlos Bernardos_web_412 joins the room
[18:52:45] Mark McFadden_web_932 joins the room
[18:52:56] Jim Reid_web_945 leaves the room
[18:53:22] John Border_web_996 joins the room
[18:53:29] Roman Danyliw_web_493 joins the room
[18:53:57] tim costello_web_119 joins the room
[18:54:29] <Roman Danyliw_web_493> the quality is a little fuzzy but readable
[18:54:56] Alessandro Amirante_web_447 joins the room
[18:55:14] Alessandro Amirante_web_447 leaves the room
[18:55:20] Alexandre Petrescu_web_473 joins the room
[18:55:22] Jen Linkova_web_872 joins the room
[18:55:51] Kaitlin Pollet_web_240 joins the room
[18:56:24] Kaitlin Pollet_web_240 leaves the room
[18:56:25] Yoshifumi Atarashi_web_685 joins the room
[18:56:33] Ted Hardie_web_673 joins the room
[18:56:46] Erik Kline_web_258 joins the room
[18:57:13] Amelia Andersdotter_web_563 joins the room
[18:57:24] Daphanie Nisbeth_web_947 joins the room
[18:57:59] Olaf Kolkman_web_521 joins the room
[18:58:00] Alissa Cooper_web_830 joins the room
[18:58:06] Andrew Campling_web_923 joins the room
[18:58:10] Behcet Sarikaya_web_653 joins the room
[18:58:10] Hermin Anggawijaya_web_383 joins the room
[18:58:12] Timothy Winters_web_538 joins the room
[18:58:23] Wei Pan_web_651 joins the room
[18:58:34] Éric Vyncke_web_388 joins the room
[18:58:36] Andy Malis_web_496 joins the room
[18:58:50] Dan Romascanu_web_206 joins the room
[18:58:57] Paolo Volpato_web_908 joins the room
[18:59:01] Jerome Henry_web_886 joins the room
[18:59:11] Naoya Kaneko_web_619 joins the room
[18:59:16] Jari Arkko_web_654 joins the room
[18:59:18] Glenn Deen_web_635 joins the room
[18:59:24] Dave Thaler_web_692 joins the room
[18:59:28] Eric Kinnear_web_325 joins the room
[18:59:39] Jason Weil_web_926 joins the room
[18:59:57] Ted Hardie_web_673 leaves the room
[19:00:10] Erik Nordmark_web_432 joins the room
[19:00:20] Stefan Santesson_web_377 joins the room
[19:00:20] David K_web_939 joins the room
[19:00:22] Andrew S_web_211 joins the room
[19:00:32] Andrew Campling_web_923 leaves the room
[19:00:35] Tadahiko Ito_web_216 joins the room
[19:00:39] Tero Kivinen_web_351 joins the room
[19:00:41] BEHCET SARIKAYA joins the room
[19:00:46] Ted Hardie_web_111 joins the room
[19:00:47] Ram Ranganathan_web_273 joins the room
[19:00:58] Marco Liebsch_web_364 joins the room
[19:00:59] Tim Cappalli_web_251 joins the room
[19:01:12] Stefan Santesson_web_377 leaves the room
[19:01:17] Chonggang Wang_web_916 joins the room
[19:01:21] Stefan Santesson_web_532 joins the room
[19:01:22] Antoine Fressancourt_web_221 joins the room
[19:01:38] Mohit Sethi_web_939 joins the room
[19:01:47] Luigi Iannone_web_229 joins the room
[19:01:49] Peter Yee_web_442 joins the room
[19:01:57] Ben Campbell_web_789 joins the room
[19:02:00] Stefan Santesson_web_532 leaves the room
[19:02:08] Monika Ermert_web_235 joins the room
[19:02:34] Frode Kileng_web_952 joins the room
[19:02:41] <Ben Campbell_web_789> contrast on text is low
[19:02:53] Lixia Zhang_web_172 joins the room
[19:03:00] Francois Ortolan_web_626 joins the room
[19:03:00] Olaf Kolkman_web_521 leaves the room
[19:03:19] Pascal Thubert_web_881 joins the room
[19:03:35] matt.peterson@quest.com_web_504 joins the room
[19:03:36] Olaf Kolkman_web_600 joins the room
[19:03:49] Joerg Ott_web_915 joins the room
[19:04:27] Ahmed Aldabbagh_web_454 joins the room
[19:04:31] Sergey Fomin_web_798 joins the room
[19:04:40] Cullen Jennings_web_786 joins the room
[19:04:56] <Carlos Bernardos_web_412> I'm afraid we cannot easily change the contrast now, sorry about that
[19:05:05] Joey Salazar_web_413 joins the room
[19:05:18] Michael Scharf_web_934 joins the room
[19:05:28] Ahmed Aldabbagh_web_454 leaves the room
[19:05:32] Ahmed Aldabbagh_web_142 joins the room
[19:05:44] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> sharing screen is the way to go: slides are sharp albeit some contrast issue
[19:05:59] Ahmed Aldabbagh_web_142 leaves the room
[19:06:03] Ahmed Aldabbagh_web_233 joins the room
[19:06:04] Stephan Emile_web_758 joins the room
[19:06:06] Benoît Claise_web_935 joins the room
[19:06:52] Julien Maisonneuve_web_857 joins the room
[19:07:02] Benoît Claise_web_935 leaves the room
[19:07:06] Benoît Claise_web_550 joins the room
[19:07:11] Magnus Westerlund_web_709 joins the room
[19:07:24] Enke Chen_web_296 joins the room
[19:08:03] frodek joins the room
[19:08:07] mcr joins the room
[19:09:22] Chris Box_web_163 joins the room
[19:10:11] Tim Twell_web_777 joins the room
[19:10:17] Monika Ermert_web_235 leaves the room
[19:12:05] Monika Ermert_web_914 joins the room
[19:12:19] Xavier de Foy_web_991 joins the room
[19:13:13] Monika Ermert_web_914 leaves the room
[19:13:19] Monika Ermert_web_714 joins the room
[19:13:22] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> The ultimate goal for this WG-forming BoF is to answer the section 4 of RFC 5434 based on the presentations and discussions in the next 2 hours.
[19:13:22] Joey Salazar_web_413 leaves the room
[19:13:23] James Galvin_web_489 joins the room
[19:14:14] David Luu_web_533 joins the room
[19:14:57] Sergey Fomin_web_798 leaves the room
[19:15:07] Joey Salazar_web_298 joins the room
[19:17:38] Chonggang Wang_web_916 leaves the room
[19:18:03] Joey Salazar_web_298 leaves the room
[19:18:14] Joey Salazar_web_399 joins the room
[19:19:06] Shane Kerr_web_747 joins the room
[19:19:09] <Roman Danyliw_web_493> Is the intent for this proposed WG to conduct a similar study (just like RCM TIG/SG) on the impact of RCM to IETF protocols?  The charter text has "The MADINAS Working Group will examine the effect of RCM schemes on network and application services in several scenarios identified as relevant."
[19:20:06] Joey Salazar_web_399 leaves the room
[19:22:17] Enke Chen_web_296 leaves the room
[19:22:39] Jen Linkova_web_872 leaves the room
[19:22:45] Jen Linkova_web_894 joins the room
[19:23:04] <Ben Campbell_web_789> This isn't working--need to fix it
[19:23:11] <Shane Kerr_web_747> So... quiet...
[19:23:21] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> @meetecho any chance to increase the volume ?
[19:23:27] <Jason Weil_web_926> Is it a mic issue?
[19:23:29] <mcr> I can't hear him at all.
[19:23:30] <Luigi Iannone_web_229> not easy to follow
[19:23:35] <Cullen Jennings_web_786> I can't understand any of this
[19:23:40] <Cullen Jennings_web_786> I think he has the wrong mic
[19:23:48] <mcr> His mic gain is too low, or he selected the wrong mic.
[19:23:53] <Ben Campbell_web_789> can we stop and fix this? Presentation isn't working with sound so low.
[19:23:54] Chonggang Wang_web_325 joins the room
[19:23:57] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> can we pause until he fixes
[19:24:18] <mcr> need to start over from beginning.
[19:24:19] <Meetecho> He can change the mic from the settings/change devices button
[19:24:26] Joey Salazar_web_269 joins the room
[19:24:30] <Meetecho> If he's using the wrong mic
[19:24:31] <Joerg Ott_web_915> turning up the volume to a level that hurts when somebody else speaks, helps
[19:25:29] <Ben Campbell_web_789> Thanks!
[19:25:39] <Cullen Jennings_web_786> The change device button does not actually work for me
[19:26:03] Joey Salazar_web_269 leaves the room
[19:26:34] <Ted Hardie_web_111> various sectors of our members doesn't say much; naming who has trouble would be useful here, I think.
[19:26:53] Joey Salazar_web_982 joins the room
[19:27:03] Samuel Weiler_web_815 joins the room
[19:27:19] Taiji Kimura_web_197 joins the room
[19:27:26] Jari Arkko_web_654 leaves the room
[19:27:32] Jari Arkko_web_310 joins the room
[19:28:41] Jari Arkko_web_310 leaves the room
[19:28:46] Jari Arkko_web_286 joins the room
[19:29:06] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> How about SAE Password ID? That is the solution for home
[19:29:25] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> Not sure why that one is being overlooked in these discussions
[19:29:34] Alexander Mayrhofer_web_355 joins the room
[19:29:52] Gorry Fairhurst_web_145 joins the room
[19:29:55] Jari Arkko_web_286 leaves the room
[19:29:59] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> Passpoint = outside the home
SAE Password ID (users and/or devices) + DPP (devices) = inside the home
[19:30:01] Jari Arkko_web_840 joins the room
[19:30:13] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> done. problem solved :)
[19:30:14] Carlos Silva_web_469 joins the room
[19:30:17] Zhe Lou_web_337 joins the room
[19:30:38] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> How many homes do user per user credentials ?
[19:30:45] Sri Gundavelli_web_547 joins the room
[19:30:55] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> Don't think anyone offers it
[19:30:58] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> How many homes rely on  per user credentials ?
[19:31:14] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> @tim: I failed to spot the 2nd degree ;-)
[19:31:16] <Jason Weil_web_926> none today Eric. many will in time :)
[19:31:21] <mcr> DPP does onboarding, not authentication, and in current documents, it provides a single credential to the device.
[19:31:51] <Jason Weil_web_926> DPP supports Per device PSK
[19:32:05] Leonardo Steller_web_578 joins the room
[19:32:12] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> Using DPP for a PSK would be unfortunate
[19:32:36] <mcr> per-device PSK depends upon the AAA structure using the MAC address to index into the PSK database.
[19:32:50] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> *proprietary* per device PSK does
[19:33:20] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> most deployments do not want per-device PSKs bound to device identifiers
[19:33:30] <mcr> @Tim, I have running code, I have no idea how to lookup an appropriate PSK lookup without the mac address.
[19:33:36] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> it is simply a hack because there is no other option
[19:33:54] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> @mcr, many vendors offer multi-PSK without AAA / device lookup
[19:33:57] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> all proprietary
[19:34:12] <mcr> @Tim, then I'll bet they just try all PSKs until they find one that works.
[19:34:33] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> yes, some do that
[19:34:34] <mcr> I'm talking about code in hostapd.
[19:34:46] <mcr> hostapd is AAA "infrastructure", even if it's all "local"
[19:35:39] <mcr> @Eric, the IETF role is that we own EAP.
[19:35:40] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> JC indeed whatever MADINAS charter will be, the coordination with IEEE & WBA is obviously important
[19:36:09] <Roman Danyliw_web_493> Thanks for that clarity.  To have a dedicated WG for the liaisons suggests a particular volume of work.  What I'm hearing said is that there is a lot of work anticipated.
[19:36:46] <mcr> Roman, I don't think that we need much in the way of new protocols.  Alan's EAP onboarding document would be helpful. Basically, we (the IETF) need to convince the other groups that PSK is dead.
[19:36:49] Alexander Mayrhofer_web_355 leaves the room
[19:36:59] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> the MAC addresses allocated by DHCPv6 - are they random somehow? (RFC8947)
[19:37:11] <mcr> Alexandre, DHCPv6 does not allocate MAC addresses.
[19:37:39] <Roman Danyliw_web_493> @mcr: my understanding is that NO new protocol work is being suggested
[19:37:42] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> @MCR DHCP allows for MAC allocation in the case of VM host for its VM guestes ;
[19:37:48] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> not MAC addresses then, but maybe link-layer addresses
[19:38:14] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> DHCP is the one problem that I don't think has a solution yet
[19:38:19] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> Identity/AAA is solved
[19:38:33] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> (specifically DHCP reservations)
[19:38:42] <mcr> Roman, I think that we need to write an architecture of how to put our existing things together.
[19:38:43] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> Anyway, this DHCP/MAC is kind of out of topic IMHO (no hat in this chat)
[19:39:11] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> yes I agree DHCP-MAC out of main concern, just wondering
[19:39:11] Joey Salazar_web_982 leaves the room
[19:39:25] <mcr> We need buy-in from WBA and IEEE in order to get a wide variety of vendors and operators onboard.
[19:39:31] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> IMO DHCP is more important than what is being discussed here as it is not a solved problem
[19:39:34] <Roman Danyliw_web_493> @mcr: an architecture is not how I read the charter text.  I also don't follow the scope of the architecture
[19:40:41] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> Indeed, currently, there is no 'protocol work/architecture' plan in the draft charter. But, WG can be re-chartered later of course but this is a different story
[19:40:42] <mcr> I did ask for the link to the charter text on the ML, but I now can't find that, or remember what it said.
[19:40:51] Monika Ermert_web_714 leaves the room
[19:41:22] <Roman Danyliw_web_493>
[19:41:33] <Roman Danyliw_web_493> The group will produce the following deliverables:
- An Informational Problem Statement document, including use cases analysis and requirements.
- An Informational MAC Address Randomization analysis document.
- A Best Common Practices document.
[19:41:36] <Carlos Bernardos_web_412> @mcr: you can find the charter on the slides at the meetings material
[19:42:34] <Carlos Bernardos_web_412> I mean the latest version of the charter, including some of the feedback that was discussed on the ML
[19:43:08] Cullen Jennings_web_786 leaves the room
[19:43:14] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> I have a Q: Jerome did not mention 802.1 at all, why? I thought 802.1 defines MAC address structure, and its evolution?
[19:43:15] Cullen Jennings_web_791 joins the room
[19:43:20] Samuel Weiler_web_815 leaves the room
[19:44:06] Samuel Weiler_web_673 joins the room
[19:44:08] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> I think it is felt by many that the risk of normal MAC addresses is in the wireless...
[19:44:34] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> but that might be 802.15.4 too and other '802.wireless' than 802.11
[19:45:08] Chris Box_web_163 leaves the room
[19:45:08] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> Ethernet is a very heavy user
[19:45:30] Chris Box_web_375 joins the room
[19:46:02] <Juan-Carlos Zúñiga_web_474> 802E was handled by 802.1
[19:46:15] Samuel Weiler_web_673 leaves the room
[19:46:18] Joey Salazar_web_120 joins the room
[19:46:19] <Juan-Carlos Zúñiga_web_474> Jerome did mention it
[19:46:23] Sergey Fomin_web_982 joins the room
[19:46:31] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> Thanks JC  :)
[19:46:39] <Juan-Carlos Zúñiga_web_474> 802E gave birth to 802.11bh/bi
[19:46:50] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> Ethernet is heavily used and heavy user of MAC addresses but it requires a mechanical plugging into an RJ45 owned by someone in order to 'snoop', whereas in 'wireless' it is sufficient to listen the air which is apublic good.
[19:47:21] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> on path vs passive
[19:47:26] Jason Weil_web_926 leaves the room
[19:47:30] Jason Weil_web_671 joins the room
[19:49:21] Alan DeKok_web_980 joins the room
[19:51:25] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> There is also virtualization and they increase a lot the use of MAC addresses
[19:52:10] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> They may have a similar problem as we have in IETF, 32 bit vs 128 bit IP addresses
[19:52:21] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> I agree virtualization needs identifiers like 48bit numbers represented as x:x:x:x:x:x.  Do these qualify as MAC addresses?
[19:52:29] Joey Salazar_web_120 leaves the room
[19:52:34] Joey Salazar_web_875 joins the room
[19:53:02] Jen Linkova_web_894 leaves the room
[19:53:08] Jen Linkova_web_814 joins the room
[19:53:20] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> so software use of MAC addresses as in VMs
[19:54:21] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> But VMs would need to simply generate unique 'MAC' addresses, rather than random, I think.
[19:54:25] Joey Salazar_web_875 leaves the room
[19:54:29] Joey Salazar_web_961 joins the room
[19:55:45] Olaf Kolkman_web_600 leaves the room
[19:55:56] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> I have an issue with the acronym MADINAS, I think it should have included RCM which is the main issue, rigth?
[19:56:34] Olaf Kolkman_web_418 joins the room
[19:56:41] Robert Moskowitz joins the room
[19:56:50] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> @behcet, isn't it 'bikesheding' ? Let's focus first on the charter then we can think about the name ;-)
[19:56:58] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> if RCM is the main focus...  but MADINAS sounds good, whereas RCMINAS would not sound that good.
[19:57:03] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> @Alex: random could be not unique?
[19:57:17] Subir Das_web_542 joins the room
[19:57:34] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> Behcet, there is a difference between random numners and unique numbers.  The first ones ar ehard to generate, whereas the last ones are very easy to make.
[19:58:01] Bob Hinden_web_659 joins the room
[19:58:07] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> it's hard to make random numbers be unique.
[19:58:17] <Alissa Cooper_web_830> Sorry if this is a naïve question, but is the loss of the global identifier space where you can guarantee uniqueness (no collisions) a problem? How do the variety of device ID schemes that may be on the table to replace the use of MAC address across these various scenarios guarantee global uniqueness at any given point in time? Or is that not a requirement?
[19:58:27] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> I mean collision
[19:58:42] Robert Moskowitz_web_627 joins the room
[19:58:44] Zhe Lou_web_337 leaves the room
[19:59:01] Juliusz Chroboczek_web_551 joins the room
[19:59:06] Juliusz Chroboczek_web_551 leaves the room
[19:59:10] Juliusz Chroboczek_web_821 joins the room
[19:59:20] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> @Alissa, agreed!
[19:59:39] <Dave Thaler_web_692> @Alexandre: Studying The RCM Problem (strcmp)
[19:59:44] Alessandro Toppi_web_248 joins the room
[20:00:03] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> @Alissa I am not sure but I guess that IEEE has defined a scheme similar to the IP-layer DAD
[20:00:07] Alessandro Toppi_web_248 leaves the room
[20:01:21] Tobia Castaldi_web_394 joins the room
[20:01:47] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> I'm still struggling to understand why this is an IETF effort
[20:02:22] <Dave Thaler_web_692> the analysis and problem statement do seem overlapping to me
[20:02:27] <Sri Gundavelli_web_547> Global uniqueness is not needed. Local uniqueness is sufficient, as long as we tie the identifier to a stable authenticated identity
[20:02:30] <Jason Weil_web_671> Is Unique Local MAC a thing? mostly joking but not clear between globally unique vs network unique
[20:02:37] <Antoine Fressancourt_web_221> Is it planned to make the contents of IEEE or MBA documents dealing with RCM public ? Otherwise it is a bit frustrating to discuss based on reports from people who could access those documents without the actual source
[20:02:52] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> @Eric, yes, I think so
[20:03:36] <Gorry Fairhurst_web_145> ... uniqueness across L2 sounds hard, sounds like something useful to understand.
[20:03:37] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> @Antoine great point, that is critical if this effort moves forward
[20:04:12] Francois Ortolan_web_626 leaves the room
[20:04:36] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> "Unique Local MAC"?  Makes think of U-L. Addresses, which did get through at IETF and in deployment.
[20:04:47] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> Most of IEEE standards are public
[20:05:05] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> new ones become after 6 months
[20:05:08] <Ted Hardie_web_111> On the IEEE docs question, do you see what you are looking for here: ?
[20:05:08] Tobia Castaldi_web_394 leaves the room
[20:05:28] <Antoine Fressancourt_web_221> OK, if you have a pointer to the actual 802.11bh doc that I can read without hitting a paywall, please be my guest :-)
[20:05:35] Samuel Weiler_web_985 joins the room
[20:05:43] <Benoît Claise_web_550> "Current state of affair" instead of "Problem Statement" makes sense. Now, we can always debate whether such a thing is a document/a WIKI/something else
[20:05:52] <Jason Weil_web_671> That's what made me think about it @Alexandre
[20:06:13] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> but, does one have to leave one's postal address in a web form before reading the IEEE document?  (a privacy issue of a privacy issue)
[20:06:52] <Antoine Fressancourt_web_221> @Ted I can see meeting minutes, but I think IEEE standards have a more concise form
[20:07:24] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> Draft IEEE docs are in mentor server and anyone with an IEEE account can access
[20:07:30] Cheng Li_web_891 joins the room
[20:07:54] Ted Hardie_web_111 leaves the room
[20:08:09] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> earlier I tried to get an IEEE account and it requested my postal address.
[20:08:50] <Antoine Fressancourt_web_221> @Behcet good to know, but I don't have one
[20:08:55] Ted Hardie_web_942 joins the room
[20:09:05] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> @benoit not all I-D end up as a published RFC as you know :-)
[20:09:06] <Luigi Iannone_web_229> I wonder whether the last document should renamed "recommandation" since at the end recommandations could be how to use existing solution (may be developed by other SDOs) or the final recommandation can be "we need a solution that does X"
[20:09:13] <Robert Moskowitz> So they flood your snail mail with ieee member offers!
[20:09:14] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> @benoit but I like the name
[20:10:02] matt.peterson@quest.com_web_504 leaves the room
[20:10:06] Lixia Zhang_web_172 leaves the room
[20:10:22] Lixia Zhang_web_839 joins the room
[20:10:24] <Robert Moskowitz> But I am an IEEE senior member, so I no longer get all those intro snail mails.  ;)
[20:10:36] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> @Bob, yes but after a while it stops
[20:10:38] Lixia Zhang_web_839 leaves the room
[20:10:53] <Benoît Claise_web_550> @Eric. Make it clear in the charter then, to set the right expectations.
[20:11:19] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> @Benoit: point taken
[20:11:26] <Antoine Fressancourt_web_221> @Behcet funny that you have to provide private info to work on a privacy-enhancing tech
[20:11:54] <Robert Moskowitz> left hand/right hand miss match.
[20:12:08] <Robert Moskowitz> mismatch.
[20:12:56] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> @Antoine agreed!
[20:13:49] Ram Ranganathan_web_273 leaves the room
[20:14:08] <Robert Moskowitz> note that some ieee efforts are closed to a specific set of members only.  Their work is really private and their docs are only available within their members.  Really a problem at times (like power wireline did with their version of networking).
[20:14:26] <Sri Gundavelli_web_547> "Client and the Service Provider" ... is one scenario ..for other non-service oriented architectures ..we should clarify to include those enterprise scenarios
[20:14:46] <Sri Gundavelli_web_547> @Eric
[20:14:54] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> Bob M. I agree with the problem of some IEEE draft docs no tbeing available to interested readers.
[20:15:17] <Jason Weil_web_671> One example of a solution in the IEEE is an 802 node could request a unique ID from another 802 node. If something like this emerges in IEEE, a higher layer protocol or at least BCP to something that already exists may be needed to determine and populate this field. (But this requires waiting to see what IEEE comes up with first)
[20:15:27] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> great question Roman!
[20:15:47] <Roman Danyliw_web_493> I apologize, I wasn't at the first BOF
[20:16:11] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> Issue with short term WG: in IETF nothing is short term
[20:16:27] <Juliusz Chroboczek_web_821> (giggle)
[20:16:28] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> "One example of a solution in the IEEE is an 802 node could request a unique ID from another 802 node." - it's happening somehow in ad-hoc mode when they come up with a MAC address having the role of an ephemeral ESSID.
[20:17:15] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> They will break based on how people have deployed technologies today
[20:17:21] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> that's an important distinction
[20:17:31] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> Easy button deployment decisions have consequences
[20:17:32] Jason Weil_web_671 leaves the room
[20:17:36] Jason Weil_web_411 joins the room
[20:17:41] <Bob Hinden_web_659> +1
[20:18:00] <Roman Danyliw_web_493> Thanks
[20:18:21] <Roman Danyliw_web_493> It might be helpful to clearly explain who is the intended consumer of the guidance
[20:18:31] <Tim Cappalli_web_251> ^^ +1
[20:18:56] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> @Roman if not mistaken, some are listed in the I-D
[20:19:52] Joey Salazar_web_961 leaves the room
[20:19:56] Joey Salazar_web_195 joins the room
[20:20:18] Dave Thaler_web_692 leaves the room
[20:20:25] Dave Thaler_web_464 joins the room
[20:20:35] Adam Wiethuechter_web_723 joins the room
[20:20:36] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> funny how one has to act even when not her raising hands.
[20:20:50] Olaf Kolkman_web_418 leaves the room
[20:21:04] Olaf Kolkman_web_562 joins the room
[20:21:20] David K_web_939 leaves the room
[20:21:27] Andy Malis_web_496 leaves the room
[20:21:33] Andy Malis_web_902 joins the room
[20:22:08] Dino Farinacci_web_279 joins the room
[20:22:09] <Juliusz Chroboczek_web_821> I don't think "solve" is the right formulation, I'd prefer "possible to work with".
[20:22:11] <Cullen Jennings_web_791> interesting 80 people in chat and 30 people did the poll
[20:22:13] Olaf Kolkman_web_562 leaves the room
[20:22:14] <Pascal Thubert_web_881> sorry I cannot find how to raise hand
[20:22:29] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> the yellow flashing bow on the top right with a bar graph
[20:22:30] <Roman Danyliw_web_493> @pascal, click on the "chart" looking icon.
[20:22:39] <Joerg Ott_web_915> does it make sense to split clarity and scope from being solvable and useful to solve? Just to understand what the issue is?
[20:22:42] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> actually there are 89 particpants
[20:22:44] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> 36 participants out of 89 participants... participants and participants...
[20:23:02] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> this is a question of RFC 5434
[20:23:06] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> ;-)
[20:23:10] <Ted Hardie_web_942> I think we have time for Eric's point in this case, but I think the tooling is being explained differently in different sessions.  In many I've listed to, the explanation has been  no opinion is "don't answer the poll" and "do not raise hand" means the negative.  It might be nice to adjust the wording to be clearer on this.
[20:23:13] Olaf Kolkman_web_615 joins the room
[20:23:25] Jen Linkova_web_814 leaves the room
[20:23:32] Jen Linkova_web_981 joins the room
[20:23:36] Joey Salazar_web_195 leaves the room
[20:23:40] Joey Salazar_web_446 joins the room
[20:24:01] <Joerg Ott_web_915> @eric: yeah. but if the answer is not clear, then it maybe worthwhile digging further
[20:24:04] Qin Wu_web_719 joins the room
[20:24:10] Carlos Silva_web_469 leaves the room
[20:24:55] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> @joerg: open for it as it could give more information
[20:25:25] <Robert Moskowitz> In past times, IEEE 802 has made documents open to IETF.  Most noteworthy is 802.1X for working with EAP.  So this should be solveable.
[20:26:50] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> in a real room I can see who raises hands, here I cant.
[20:26:51] <Erik Kline_web_258> ( I think)
[20:27:01] <Dan Romascanu_web_206> A mechanism can be put in place to have individuals access work-in-progress documents using the IETF-IEEE coordination team. Speak to Russ Housley and Dorothy Stanley.
[20:28:08] <Michael Jenkins_web_583> @Alexandre - in a real room this would be a hum
[20:28:18] <Antoine Fressancourt_web_221> @Eric for now, neither 802.11bh nor 802.11bi are available there
[20:28:26] Olaf Kolkman_web_615 leaves the room
[20:28:31] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> It seems like it is going to be a small WG
[20:28:41] Timothy Winters_web_538 leaves the room
[20:28:50] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> we see how voting is different during these times in action
[20:29:10] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> few BoFs if any did hums, right?  (or I miss the rememberings)
[20:29:29] Juliusz Chroboczek_web_821 leaves the room
[20:30:05] <Jerome Henry_web_886> @Antoine, 11bi and 11bh have not published any draft yet (they just formed a couple of months ago)but the contributions are available here (filter by group name)
[20:30:19] Lee-Berkeley Shaw_web_670 joins the room
[20:30:22] <Ted Hardie_web_942> Humming at BoFs was pretty common in my experience.
[20:30:33] <Jerome Henry_web_886> I am humming to myself
[20:30:40] <Dan Romascanu_web_206> it's always an amended charter, the iesg can also introduce wording changes
[20:30:52] Dave Thaler_web_464 leaves the room
[20:30:57] Dave Thaler_web_225 joins the room
[20:31:26] Monika Ermert_web_484 joins the room
[20:32:01] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> donot raise hand means against I think
[20:33:00] Sergey Fomin_web_982 leaves the room
[20:33:04] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> This is better than humming, more precise counting
[20:33:14] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> too precise
[20:33:37] Michael Scharf_web_934 leaves the room
[20:34:08] Lee-Berkeley Shaw_web_670 leaves the room
[20:34:09] Subir Das_web_542 leaves the room
[20:34:16] Subir Das_web_428 joins the room
[20:34:17] Tim Cappalli_web_251 leaves the room
[20:34:46] Sri Gundavelli_web_547 leaves the room
[20:35:03] <BEHCET SARIKAYA> now late comers
[20:35:07] John Border_web_996 leaves the room
[20:35:35] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> even humming gives some indication about who hums around, and who is silent, some times.
[20:35:35] Marco Liebsch_web_364 leaves the room
[20:36:19] <mcr> when it comes to charters, the IESG performs on-path attacks that change the text :-)
[20:37:01] Mohit Sethi_web_939 leaves the room
[20:37:03] <Antoine Fressancourt_web_221> @Jerome Thanks for the pointer. Don't point to a draft, yet
[20:37:05] Monika Ermert_web_484 leaves the room
[20:37:28] Samuel Weiler_web_985 leaves the room
[20:37:50] Pascal Thubert_web_881 leaves the room
[20:37:53] Dino Farinacci_web_279 leaves the room
[20:37:54] <Joey Salazar_web_446> Thank you all
[20:37:54] Frode Kileng_web_952 leaves the room
[20:37:55] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> @mcr: oh :-O community has to agree as well ;)
[20:37:56] <Jerome Henry_web_886> @ Antoine, correct, neither group has published a draft yet
[20:37:58] Alissa Cooper_web_830 leaves the room
[20:37:59] <Alexandre Petrescu_web_473> thank you!
[20:38:00] Chonggang Wang_web_325 leaves the room
[20:38:00] Dave Thaler_web_225 leaves the room
[20:38:01] <Éric Vyncke_web_388> Thank you chairs and presenters
[20:38:01] Alan DeKok_web_980 leaves the room
[20:38:02] Xavier de Foy_web_991 leaves the room
[20:38:03] Ted Hardie_web_942 leaves the room
[20:38:03] Andrew S_web_211 leaves the room
[20:38:04] Shane Kerr_web_747 leaves the room
[20:38:04] Ben Campbell_web_789 leaves the room
[20:38:04] Dan Romascanu_web_206 leaves the room
[20:38:05] Roman Danyliw_web_493 leaves the room
[20:38:06] Markus Amend_web_349 leaves the room
[20:38:06] Qin Wu_web_719 leaves the room
[20:38:06] Bob Hinden_web_659 leaves the room
[20:38:06] Yiu Lee_web_660 leaves the room
[20:38:06] Luigi Iannone_web_229 leaves the room
[20:38:07] Eric Kinnear_web_325 leaves the room
[20:38:08] Robert Moskowitz_web_627 leaves the room
[20:38:08] Joerg Ott_web_915 leaves the room
[20:38:08] Jen Linkova_web_981 leaves the room
[20:38:08] Subir Das_web_428 leaves the room
[20:38:09] Cullen Jennings_web_791 leaves the room
[20:38:09] Jurgen Sonnenmoser_web_682 leaves the room
[20:38:10] Mark McFadden_web_932 leaves the room
[20:38:10] Peter Yee_web_442 leaves the room
[20:38:10] Glenn Deen_web_635 leaves the room
[20:38:11] Erik Kline_web_258 leaves the room
[20:38:12] Naoya Kaneko_web_619 leaves the room
[20:38:13] Jason Weil_web_411 leaves the room
[20:38:14] James Galvin_web_489 leaves the room
[20:38:15] Yoshifumi Atarashi_web_685 leaves the room
[20:38:16] Taiji Kimura_web_197 leaves the room
[20:38:16] Paolo Volpato_web_908 leaves the room
[20:38:16] Robert Moskowitz leaves the room
[20:38:19] Daphanie Nisbeth_web_947 leaves the room
[20:38:19] Joey Salazar_web_446 leaves the room
[20:38:20] Behcet Sarikaya_web_653 leaves the room
[20:38:20] <Tero Kivinen_web_351> Drafts are never in the mentor, they are always on the password protected private area, but the presentations and contributions going to the draft are in mentor.
[20:38:21] Alexandre Petrescu_web_473 leaves the room
[20:38:21] Amelia Andersdotter_web_563 leaves the room
[20:38:22] Chris Box_web_375 leaves the room
[20:38:27] Julien Maisonneuve_web_857 leaves the room
[20:38:35] Tim Twell_web_777 leaves the room
[20:38:36] BEHCET SARIKAYA leaves the room
[20:38:38] Michael Jenkins_web_583 leaves the room
[20:38:38] <Antoine Fressancourt_web_221> OK
[20:38:39] Peter Koch_web_759 leaves the room
[20:38:40] Michael Richardson_web_849 leaves the room
[20:38:52] Leonardo Steller_web_578 leaves the room
[20:38:56] <Antoine Fressancourt_web_221> Sorry for not being used to the IEEE way of working
[20:39:04] Erik Nordmark_web_432 leaves the room
[20:39:17] Éric Vyncke_web_388 leaves the room
[20:39:20] Dirk Hugo_web_417 leaves the room
[20:39:31] Antoine Fressancourt_web_221 leaves the room
[20:39:32] Benoît Claise_web_550 leaves the room
[20:39:44] Adam Wiethuechter_web_723 leaves the room
[20:39:57] <Tero Kivinen_web_351> When the IEEE document is converted to draft form then it must be put on the private area, as IEEE wants to protect its interests. It do sell the drafts out to companies etc for early access, and then of course you can purhace the final version when it is out. After it has been published it will appear to the get IEEE program after 6 months.
[20:40:16] Tero Kivinen_web_351 leaves the room
[20:41:01] frodek leaves the room
[20:41:53] Jerome Henry_web_886 leaves the room
[20:42:27] Hermin Anggawijaya_web_383 leaves the room
[20:42:54] Ahmed Aldabbagh_web_233 leaves the room
[20:44:07] Magnus Westerlund_web_709 leaves the room
[20:44:10] David Luu_web_533 leaves the room
[20:45:45] Ole Trøan_web_551 joins the room
[20:45:51] tim costello_web_119 leaves the room
[20:46:11] Cheng Li_web_891 leaves the room
[20:46:49] Ole Trøan_web_551 leaves the room
[20:50:48] Victor Rweyemamu_web_327 joins the room
[20:51:57] Victor Rweyemamu_web_327 leaves the room
[20:54:08] Kohei Isobe_web_273 joins the room
[20:54:46] Andy Malis_web_902 leaves the room
[20:55:00] Stephan Emile_web_758 leaves the room
[20:57:18] Kohei Isobe_web_273 leaves the room
[20:57:26] Carlos Bernardos_web_412 leaves the room
[20:58:43] Wei Pan_web_651 leaves the room
[21:00:31] Paolo Saviano_web_140 leaves the room
[21:00:32] Juan-Carlos Zúñiga_web_474 leaves the room
[21:00:32] Gorry Fairhurst_web_145 leaves the room
[21:00:32] Jari Arkko_web_840 leaves the room
[21:00:32] Tadahiko Ito_web_216 leaves the room
[21:02:02] Meetecho leaves the room
[21:06:00] mcr leaves the room
[21:08:01] meetecho-alex leaves the room