[15:06:09] akoba joins the room [15:06:19] nevil joins the room [15:06:50] Meeting starts: Juergen (chair) introduces agenda [15:07:27] syi101 joins the room [15:10:51] Simon Leinen joins the room [15:13:03] akoba leaves the room [15:13:57] nevil says IANA issues resolved, IPFIX IE Registry (in XML) will be on-line shortly [15:14:22] Benoit starts on MIB presentation [15:15:05] christoph joins the room [15:15:22] Juergen joins the room [15:15:26] gerhard joins the room [15:17:14] mib issues all resolved, Juergen will write up and submit to IESG [15:17:44] Benoit on per-stream SCTP raft [15:18:23] gerhard2 joins the room [15:18:44] gerhard2 leaves the room [15:18:54] gerhard leaves the room [15:18:59] gerhard2 joins the room [15:21:38] remaining qustion: nominative ref to 'SCTP Stream reset' draft (R. Stewart), no idea when that will proceed in transport area [15:22:08] should we push tsv, or what? [15:22:13] What to do if this ID dies? [15:22:40] Dan (AD): This solution is far from being optimal [15:25:38] Dan (AD) suggests "add some sentences explaining what's in the Stewart draft, and make it an informative ref" [15:25:56] Juergen will talks to Transport AD about that [15:27:04] Brian comment o. writeup for it Nevil is doint then exporting type draft [15:27:12] akoba joins the room [15:27:35] limmer joins the room [15:27:42] I mean, Nevil is doing the 'exporting types' writeup and will submit it shortly [15:27:58] Now, Brian presents "file format" draft [15:34:30] nevil doing file format writeup [15:34:43] Benoit presents Config Model draft [15:42:31] question about DTLS parameter config - Brian Trammel will write some text [15:45:52] Dependency on YANG. NETMOD submit date for YANG is Sep 09 [15:46:40] Compromise - keep YANG in a single IPFIX Config draft for now, review that when other issues resolved [15:47:12] Atsushi-san presents Mediators Problem Statement draft [15:52:48] britram@gmail.com joins the room [15:57:11] question: could intermediate processes be included in an IPFIX Exporter? [15:57:19] I think some (if not most of the terminology definitions) should be moved to the Mediation Framework draft. I also think, they need a bit more work, as they seem to still cause confusion (see my post to the mailing list) [16:02:33] hi Cristoph: yes, I agree, and I've looked over your proposed distillation of the terminology to the list; it looks good. [16:05:29] Chris Whiite makes comments about 'mediation providing a 'more holistic view of multiple exports' [16:05:41] Chris will write some tex and send to list [16:05:54] Now, the Mediation Framwork draft [16:11:43] Simon Leinen leaves the room [16:11:54] Should framework doc define IEs? [16:12:00] nodding my head, too :) [16:14:37] Brian T agrees. Juergen gives example: simple statistics (mean, mac, etc) should be in a new draft explaining them [16:15:32] can we learn from other fields who already do mediation? [16:17:03] akoba leaves the room [16:17:10] Simon Leinen joins the room [16:24:22] milestones reiewed [16:25:11] new ideas? Dan asks 'any new ideas from nmrg?' [16:33:01] christoph leaves the room [16:34:16] gerhard2 leaves the room [16:34:59] syi101 leaves the room [16:35:03] britram@gmail.com leaves the room [16:35:57] no further items to discuss, Juergen closes meeting [16:35:58] limmer leaves the room [16:36:06] nevil leaves the room [16:42:45] Juergen leaves the room [16:59:16] syi101 joins the room [17:00:52] syi101 leaves the room [17:21:24] Simon Leinen leaves the room [19:18:55] Simon Leinen joins the room [20:14:08] akoba joins the room [20:14:19] akoba leaves the room [20:22:49] Simon Leinen leaves the room [20:33:43] Simon Leinen joins the room [21:10:29] Simon Leinen leaves the room [21:26:35] Simon Leinen joins the room [23:18:58] Simon Leinen leaves the room [23:43:07] Simon Leinen joins the room