Thursday, 2 August 2012< ^ >
Room Configuration

[00:01:22] <> I can not see the slides - Bruce is presenting
[00:03:30] <> we need ENTITY-MIB v4 before the other MIBs go for Last call
[00:07:02] <Jürgen Schönwälder> How does the battery MIB depend on the ENTITY-MIB? The −05 version on refers to it in a description clause.
[00:07:41] <Jürgen Schönwälder> Juergen, still there or already asleep? ;-)
[00:08:12] <> if I can answer
[00:08:25] <benoit.claise> A battery is a component, and we want to express that a battery is inside a device.
[00:09:07] <> and also the smaller compliance of the entity MIB proposed in entity-mib v4
[00:09:51] <Jürgen Schönwälder> Benoit, I think I understand the basic organization. I was looking for something in the text that has an explicit reference to something that is not yet in the current ENTITY-MIB and did not find it.
[00:10:13] <benoit.claise> ok. I haven't read the battery mib for some time.
[00:10:44] <benoit.claise> I believe there is also a dependency on the EMAN-AWARE MIB,
[00:12:06] <Jürgen Schönwälder> Section 7.5 of −05 says "Should the batteryTable augment the entPhysicalTable from the Entity MIB?" - is that still an open issue or closed? This would cause a real dependency in the sense that today there is no battery type.
[00:12:44] <benoit.claise> I see. Good point. Can you please bring that up on the EMAN mailing list.
[00:14:27] benoit.claise leaves the room
[00:16:49] leaves the room
[00:27:15] Juergen leaves the room
[00:39:24] Jürgen Schönwälder leaves the room