- Wednesday, 1 August 2012

eman@jabber.ietf.org

Wednesday, 1 August 2012< ^ >

Room Configuration

GMT+0
[21:51:08] moulchan@cisco.com joins the room
[21:51:29] moulchan@cisco.com leaves the room
[21:53:46] moulchan@cisco.com joins the room
[22:04:06] Juergen joins the room
[22:06:31] <Juergen> Hello everybody
[22:06:41] <Juergen> I lost the audio signal.
[22:06:48] <Juergen> Does anyone get it?
[22:07:20] <moulchan@cisco.com> there is no audio link
[22:09:50] <moulchan@cisco.com> I thought webex would have an audio bridge ?
[22:09:59] <Juergen> So did I
[22:10:14] <Juergen> I am expected to give the requirements presentation remotely.
[22:10:17] <moulchan@cisco.com> how can you present without audio
[22:10:22] <Juergen> This does not work without audio
[22:10:58] <Juergen> I tried to call Bruce on his mobile, but he did not take the call.
[22:18:14] benoit.claise joins the room
[22:18:26] <benoit.claise> you can't hear us
[22:19:40] <benoit.claise> that's correct?
[22:19:49] <moulchan@cisco.com> no audio
[22:19:49] <Juergen> yes, no audio
[22:20:00] <benoit.claise> trying to sort that out.
[22:20:05] <moulchan@cisco.com> ok
[22:20:07] <moulchan@cisco.com> thanks
[22:20:16] <Juergen> thanks
[22:23:12] benoit.claise leaves the room
[22:23:15] benoit.claise joins the room
[22:23:27] <benoit.claise> John started with the terminology draft.
[22:23:44] <benoit.claise> please review the slides
[22:25:24] <benoit.claise> Dan makes the point that the Entity term should be kept.
[22:25:32] <benoit.claise> and we should not use asset
[22:25:38] <moulchan@cisco.com> i can hear the audio stream
[22:25:44] <moulchan@cisco.com> can not talk though
[22:26:22] <benoit.claise> yes, because the chairs have not requested it.
[22:32:45] <benoit.claise> Do you need webex?
[22:32:51] <moulchan@cisco.com> yes, please
[22:33:02] <moulchan@cisco.com> so that we see the sldes
[22:33:13] <moulchan@cisco.com> and if there is an audio bridge it would help
[22:33:54] <benoit.claise> requirements slide 1
[22:34:04] <benoit.claise> slide 2
[22:39:24] Juergen leaves the room: Replaced by new connection
[22:39:24] Juergen joins the room
[22:40:06] <benoit.claise> slide 3
[22:42:07] <moulchan@cisco.com> here is my question - the requiremenrs shoud state what measurements the standards should support
[22:42:29] <benoit.claise> I'll ask
[22:42:39] <moulchan@cisco.com> if the measurement is facilated by interface fine
[22:43:04] <moulchan@cisco.com> but we do not need to specify the means in requirements
[22:43:09] <benoit.claise> clearly mention your question, as I will read it:
[22:43:53] <moulchan@cisco.com> the requiremenrs shoud state what measurements the standards should support - but need not specify the means
[22:50:54] <moulchan@cisco.com> what is the resolution on the requirements
[22:51:03] benoit.claise leaves the room
[22:52:15] benoit.claise joins the room
[22:57:46] <benoit.claise> test
[22:57:55] <moulchan@cisco.com> ack
[22:58:05] <moulchan@cisco.com> i am awake
[23:00:27] <benoit.claise> ok, one issue with my pidgin, which was showing an error.
[23:13:42] <moulchan@cisco.com> with an IANA registry allows that flexibility
[23:13:54] <moulchan@cisco.com> untill there is a convergence of states
[23:14:04] <moulchan@cisco.com> can you please add that comment
[23:23:07] <benoit.claise> ?
[23:23:11] <benoit.claise> optional index?
[23:23:16] <moulchan@cisco.com> optional MIB object
[23:23:50] <moulchan@cisco.com> any suggestions on how to persist entPhysicalIndex ?
[23:24:49] <benoit.claise> ??
[23:26:33] <moulchan@cisco.com> i will do that
[23:26:35] <moulchan@cisco.com> thanks
[23:35:33] <moulchan@cisco.com> we can add a new MIB object for UUID
[23:42:01] <moulchan@cisco.com> i will take the action item for the IANA considerations
[23:42:06] <benoit.claise> thanks Mouli
[23:44:03] <benoit.claise> do you want to skype Bruce Nordman?
[23:44:15] <moulchan@cisco.com> I do not have skype
[23:44:20] <benoit.claise> ok
[23:44:59] Jürgen Schönwälder joins the room
[23:48:23] <moulchan@cisco.com> printer power states are standardized
[23:48:48] <moulchan@cisco.com> the question is - should we add that in the power state sets
[23:55:12] <moulchan@cisco.com> we shall write the implementation guidelines
[23:55:29] <moulchan@cisco.com> once the MIB modules, and framework are completed
[23:55:54] <moulchan@cisco.com> can you please add that comment
[23:56:17] <benoit.claise> ok
[23:58:18] <moulchan@cisco.com> thanks