[07:08:59] cdlilj joins the room [08:10:34] cdlilj leaves the room [08:10:35] cdlilj joins the room [09:24:22] benoit.claise joins the room [09:25:02] test. Please ignore. [09:25:16] benoit.claise leaves the room [10:44:43] Chris Verges joins the room [11:00:38] benoit.claise joins the room [11:00:50] one issue with webex. [11:01:01] I noticed the timing was off by 2 hours ... [11:03:15] cdlilj leaves the room [11:03:46] cdlilj joins the room [11:04:57] bhoeneis joins the room [11:06:04] ws4d joins the room [11:07:12] narten joins the room [11:07:55] Juergen presenting the requirement document slides. [11:13:12] suzukisn joins the room [11:14:49] cdlilj leaves the room [11:15:17] webex username/password being entered ... ;-) [11:15:27] Huge "Thank You" from the remote people :-) [11:20:32] +1 to the dual simple/complex model proposed [11:36:55] bhoeneis leaves the room [11:36:55] ws4d leaves the room [11:36:55] suzukisn leaves the room [11:38:42] suzukisn joins the room [11:40:33] ws4d joins the room [11:43:04] bhoeneis joins the room [11:52:41] ws4d leaves the room [11:53:19] rolf.winter joins the room [12:12:39] On pmPowerIndex, this seems like a complex if/else-if/else schema that isn't structurally enforced in the MIB. What NMS or end user confusion might occur as a result of this? [12:13:42] ok [12:13:46] chris, Mouli will answre on the list. [12:13:49] thanks for relaying, benoit [12:22:53] bhoeneis leaves the room [12:36:17] alex.petrescu joins the room [12:38:44] Yes, it is intended to mean "there are multiple objectives." [12:39:03] And to indicate that the work that EMAN does will be continued into the future. [12:40:06] Benoit — you can skip the Health/Alert page (next) [12:40:41] (measuring the delay... I am on the physical room Vienna, wifi laptop, listening to mp3 stream with one year and physical sound with the othe rr year) [12:40:46] yes [12:41:03] PDUs support the concept of high current alerts, low current alerts, etc. [12:41:17] threshold condition tracking [12:41:22] useful to NMS trying to identify problems [12:41:39] ok [12:41:40] ok [12:41:42] (dealy around 10seconds) [12:43:10] #3 is intended to mean that we may want to look at different MIB deliverables. [12:43:24] hahaha [12:44:26] For maintainability going forward into the future. [12:44:38] sounds good, thank you all! [12:45:30] Thanks chris, bring it to the list, but you must have good arguments for this to convince our AD ;-) [12:45:41] narten leaves the room: Replaced by new connection [12:45:42] narten joins the room [12:46:04] understood, thanks for being the rep in the room, benoit [12:48:49] agreed with john's point. states vs. status. [13:01:11] Let's "borrow" the ODVA's use cases for a validity check against the Applicability Statement :-) [13:01:23] agreed. [13:02:48] Thanks all! [13:02:50] enjoy prague [13:03:22] Chris Verges leaves the room [13:03:24] narten leaves the room [13:03:41] benoit.claise leaves the room [13:05:35] rolf.winter leaves the room [13:07:23] suzukisn leaves the room [13:10:46] narten joins the room [13:11:02] narten leaves the room [13:11:52] suzukisn joins the room [13:15:23] alex.petrescu leaves the room [13:15:33] alex.petrescu joins the room [13:16:27] suzukisn leaves the room [13:18:33] alex.petrescu leaves the room: offline [13:29:27] roberto.quadrini joins the room [13:29:42] roberto.quadrini leaves the room [13:31:26] roberto.quadrini joins the room [13:31:31] hello [13:31:43] roberto.quadrini leaves the room [13:42:12] roberto.quadrini joins the room [13:42:26] hello my name is Roberto Quadrini [13:47:28] roberto.quadrini leaves the room